Saturday, February 14, 2009

Using Microsoft Agents in teaching-- Good or Bad?

Microsoft Agent is a tool used to create innovative, audio interfaces for applications (like power-point and words) and Web pages. It provides animation capability, interactivity, and versatility, with incredible ease of development.
Good
Microsoft Agents creates a pleasant learning environment with its visual and audio animation. It is ideal in drawing learner's attention (thru its emphasing keywords technique or thru its gestures) to a specific item in the learning presentation. It also provides an alternative medium for presentation work; esp good for "wordy" presentation.
Poor
  • It cannot be used for all presentation type; esp those where the serious element is vital, because it seems a little childish.
  • The voice of the agent is rather synthetic; in fact it has some Pronunciation problems with technical jargon and some non-English words which are used commonly in English language (eg guru, mantra, Bon voyage, Bon Fide).
  • Oh ya! to view the agents..you must download the Microsoft Agent pack otherwise no agents can be viewed.
  • Having Limited agents also can be issue if you exhaust all agents for your lessons.
  • Lastly, to apply the agents on your website, you must have the technical know-how.

My View:

If teaching the pri/sec levels, using microsoft agents would be a good way to get their attention to be subject matter. It also adds colour,variation,sound and animation to the conventional slides. It might not work too well for tertiary students (can't imagine my NUS lecturer using peedy to explain thermodynamics or process controls).

With the 2 links given by Mr Woo, I find it easier to understand and comprehend the content when animation is used. But i must add that my judgement may not be fair because i read the content from the non-animation first; Thus with my prior knowledge, viewing the animation one made me understand things easier.

So let's hear your view---from those you watch the animation site before the non-animated one!

3 comments:

  1. Hi Amit! Unfortunately, I'm not one of those who viewed the agent based version first so I can't offer my opinion on that. I do however, agree with you that the agents can be a good tool to be used for the pri/sec level. Though to be more precise, I feel that it's probably up to sec 2, maybe sec 3. I'm not sure if students in the sec 3 level would still be patient enough to go through the synthetic voices and the rest of the constraints. What do you think? Perhaps we could do a research on this and the co-write an article and get it published in one of those education journals. Haha!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear spongebob, I supposed you are Simon. That is a good idea to do a research on the agents. If you are seriously interested, we could probably collaborate. Let's make it an action research. Let me know your decision.

    WooHL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Simon. I agree with you that the agents used will work up to a certain age group. Like what i mention in my blog "It might not work too well for tertiary students (can't imagine my NUS lecturer using peedy to explain thermodynamics or process controls)." However, not sure whether pupils at sec sch will enjoy the agents (due to its constraints). Yes, writing a research paper (sounds great) on this topic will proof our problem statement.

    ReplyDelete